Reading

Psy 5054 ]


Perceptual Processes in Reading

  • Template Matching
  • A Computational Analysis of Reading
  • PANDEMONIUM
  • The Interactive Activation Model
  • Acoustic Recoding
  • Reading Units
  • Reading and the Brain

Template Matching

  • What is a template?
  • Problems with Templates
  • Pre-Processing

What is a template?

  • A template is a stored pattern.
  • According to template matching theories, letters are recognized by finding a template that matches them.

Problems with Templates

  • Orientation
  • Size
  • Novelty
  • "O" versus "Q"

Preprocessing

  • A preprocessor corrects the size and orientation of the image before it is compared to the stored templates.
  • Circularity Problem
    • The preprocessor has to know what the pattern is to know its correct size and orientation.

A Computational Analysis of Reading

  • What information is available?
  • What is the goal of the computation?
  • What strategy is used to achieve the goal with the available information?

PANDEMONIUM (Selfridge, 1959)

  • The Architecture
  • Representational Assumptions
  • Processing Assumptions
  • Processing Characteristics
  • Empirical Tests

THE ARCHITECTURE

Representational Assumptions

  • Features
  • Demons
    • Demons represent hypotheses.
    • Demons are connected to other demons (input, output).
  • Levels of Representation
    • Decision Demon
    • Cognitive (Letter) Demons
    • Feature Extraction Demons
    • Image Demons

Processing Assumptions

  • Each demon has an activation level.
  • The activation level begins at baseline (0).
  • When a demon receives input, its activation level rises.
  • As the activation rises, confidence in the hypothesis rises.
  • This is a very straightforward spreading activation process.

Processing Characteristics

  • Bottom-up, top-down, or interactive?
  • Parallel or sequential within levels?
  • Parallel or sequential between levels?
  • Automatic or controlled?
  • Symbolic or sub-symbolic?
  • Modular?

Empirical Tests (Neisser, 1967)

  • Visual Search
    • Slope as DV
  • Search for 2 targets as quickly as one?
    • Parallel Processing
  • Similar background harder than dissimilar?
    • Features

The Interactive Activation Model (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981)

  • The Architecture
  • Comparisons to PANDEMONIUM
  • An Empirical Test
  • A Problem with the IAM

The Architecture

Comparisons to PANDEMONIUM

  • Levels of Representation
  • Letter/Feature Position
  • Activation Levels
    • Frequency determines baseline level of activation.
    • Recognition occurs when threshold is reached.
  • Excitation versus Inhibition
  • Horizontal versus Vertical Connections
  • Competition Among Competing Alternatives
  • Advantages of Simulation

An Empirical Test

  • A Demonstration
  • The Word Superiority Effect
  • Pronounceability versus Gang Effects

The Word Superiority Effect

  • It is easier to identify a letter when it occurs in the context of a word.
  • Some non-words (e.g., "SLET" but not "XLQJ") also facilitate letter recognition.
  • Why?

Pronounceability versus Gang Effects

  • Pronounceability is usually used to explain this pseudo-word superiority effect.
  • The IAM suggests that this effect is due instead to the fact that only some non-words share letter combinations with real words.
  • These shared letter combinations create a gang effect.
  • Rumelhart & McClelland (1982)
    • Pronounceable with Shared Letters ("SLET")
    • Unpronounceable with Shared Letters ("SLNT")
    • Unpronounceable without Shared Letters ("XLQJ")

A Problem with the IAM

  • The entire network must be crafted by hand and that’s not how people learn to read.
  • A self-organizing artificial neural network solves the problem.
  • This gives rise to distributed representations and sub-symbolic processing (McClalland & Rumelhart, 1986).

Phonological Recoding

  • When people read silently, they automatically activate the sounds of words.
    • The Tongue Twister Effect
    • Functional Imaging
  • Single Route versus Dual Route Theories
  • How would you test this?

Reading Units

  • Approaches to Reading Instruction
    • Phonics
    • Whole Word
  • Frequency and Automaticity
  • Healy (1976)
    • Word Inferiority Effect
  • How could we modify the IAM to accommodate these results?

Reading and the Brain

  • Single Cell Recordings and Features
  • Neural Style Computation
  • The 100 Step Limit
  • Functional Imaging and Acoustic Recoding
  • Dyslexia
    • Peripheral Dyslexias involve visual analysis.
    • Central Dyslexias occur at levels beyond visual analysis.
    • Can the IAM account for these dyslexias?

Peripheral Dyslexias

  • Attentional Dyslexia
    • Patients can identify letters/words in isolation but not in context.
  • Letter-By-Letter Reading
    • Patients read words one letter at a time.
    • Fixation time increases with word length.
    • No "Pop Out"
  • Neglect Dyslexia
    • Patients can’t read one side of words (usually the left).

Central Dyslexias

  • Surface Dyslexia
    • Patients are unable to read irregular words (e.g., "pint" or "broad").
    • Has the direct route been lost?
  • Phonological Dyslexia
    • Patients can’t read pronounceable non-words.
    • Has the indirect route been lost?
  • Deep Dyslexia
    • Patients make meaning-based word substitutions (e.g. "duel" --> "sword").

The End!


Psy 5054 ]

The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota

This page was last updated on 12/09/99.